Friday, April 15, 2011

Lazy journalist word of the month: Meltdown

Ever since the terrible sequence of events in Japan, I hear the word "meltdown" thrown about in all situations pertaining to the nuclear plant. Do you know exactly what the word means when you hear it on the news? Can a reporter somewhere in the U.S. bother to look it up and define it for the rest of us instead of repeating the same old word?

No, that would take work. I know this because the word isn't even in any of my (many) old print dictionaries.

For all of us who care, here's a definition, courtesy of yourdictionary.com:
"meltdown - A situation in which a rapid rise in the power level of a nuclear reactor, as from a defect in the cooling system, results in the melting of the fuel rods and the release of dangerous radiation and may cause the core to sink into the earth."

There, isn't that better?

Thursday, March 17, 2011

Red Letter Day

It actually happened.

On March 7, 2011, filling my Toyota Camry with gas at Costco cost $50.00 And that's without a service charge!

What is next for us poor suckers?

Dear Members of the Academy:

Watching the Academy Awards telecast last month, I was reminded, repeatedly, of the wise old saying that it is better to stay silent and be thought an idiot than to speak and remove all doubt.

In the case of the Oscars, not only were my fears confirmed—these actors are idiots—they washed away my appreciation of these award winners’ fine work. Why do the powers that be even allow these people to speak unscripted? After all, we know only that the nominees excel at delivering words written by others. At what point in time did the producers of the biggest praise-fest in the world start assuming that an Oscar-caliber actor could put together a cogent sentence on his or her own?

Industry types say, “C’mon, it’s their big moment.” Bullsh**. Their big moment was in the film, when they defied the odds and lived their dream of acting in a great role and getting paid for it. And then again when millions of people saw their performances. All the nominees have been receiving attention and accolades for six months to a year before the coveted gold statues are handed out. Isn’t that enough?

After being subjected to approximately 2 hours of intermittent rambling drivel, I’ve come to the conclusion that only NON actors should be permitted to give speeches. It’s hard to say which was the last straw: Melissa Leo’s classless cursing, Natalie Portman’s mindless chatter, Julian Bale, dropping names of everyone he could bore us with except that of his forgotten wife, and virtually every other winner’s indulgent, pointless and decidedly non-entertaining speeches.

You tremendous performers made us love you and innocently overestimate your charm and intelligence. Next year, please, for all our sakes, leave us our illusions and keep your mouths shut.

Friday, February 25, 2011

NYT's Column on Language Discontinued

Read all about it here:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/27/magazine/27fob-onlanguage-t.html?_r=1

Forget the end of an era and closed doors opening windows. If there is no longer an interest in perpetuating and perfecting the language we use to communicate, I fear we are headed in the wrong direction.

Until someone else picks up the language torch, we'll have to get by on the archives:
http://topics.nytimes.com/topics/features/magazine/columns/on_language/index.html

Tuesday, February 22, 2011

What I could really use

A microphone that works in a large indoor pool setting.

None of my water aerobics instructors uses a microphone when teaching poolside. I remove my glasses when I take the class so I already can't see what they are doing. And sound doesn't exactly carry in a massive space encircling the pool. Can't someone invent a cheap, waterproof microphone that focuses sound into a specific area? Like a spotlight for an amplifier!

Tuesday, January 25, 2011

Another sign that you are old

When you suddenly think everyone looks like they are 12, you are on your way over the hill. I don't know why, but 12 is the magic number. Also, when you start to use the words "marvelous" or "sumptuous," the hill is definitely in sight.

Be forewarned: NOT using these words will not keep you from aging.

Wednesday, January 5, 2011

Chicken or the Egg but with...

Boobs and Yoga. I'll explain.
Over the years, I have noticed that women who teach yoga always seem to have remarkably nice and, to my untrained eye, natural breasts. Of course, my first assumption was that the particular exercising they did enhanced their bodies in this way.

But recently it occurred to me that it may be the other way around. What if women with terrific breasts are drawn to yoga instructing? So either they decide to teach and are subsequently (magically?) presented with a nice rack, or they catch themselves in the mirror one day and say, "This body should teach yoga!"

It's got to be one or the other, right?